A few HL ????s
Aug. 18th, 2007 01:42 pmI am finishing up the third story in my Immortal Dean 'verse and I want to clarify a few HL canon issues. It has to do with the idea of Dean being as foundling or not.
How "canon" is the concept that all Immortals are orphans? Or is it that by the time the Watchers start tracking them there is no way to confirm parentage? I know that Duncan's parents have said they don't know where he came from and I think Ritchie was in foster care. Is it because of them, that this has become canon?
What is the prevailing theory about where the Immortals come from? Would I be committing huge HL heresy if I kept Dean and Sam related? The story can go either way but this is the big turning point.
How "canon" is the concept that all Immortals are orphans? Or is it that by the time the Watchers start tracking them there is no way to confirm parentage? I know that Duncan's parents have said they don't know where he came from and I think Ritchie was in foster care. Is it because of them, that this has become canon?
What is the prevailing theory about where the Immortals come from? Would I be committing huge HL heresy if I kept Dean and Sam related? The story can go either way but this is the big turning point.